I have discovered another reason for swelling or firm nodules. It is not acute or chronic inflammation. It is not any kind of scar. And it is not due to calcium deposits. It is actually due to too much accumulation of structured water. And this seems to be due to too much negative charge accumulation. How do I come to this conclusion? From personal experience and experimentation. I had a second stroke as a result of an almost completely blocked left carotid artery! So, I had surgery to remove the blockage. As a result, I had about a 3-1/2 inch wound that was stitched up. he end that the stitches were knotted up wound up more swollen than the rest. And in particular where the muscle was put back together. So I tried FSM on it. First the wound healing protocol. That seemed to help with the other side of the stitches. But did not do anything for the lump on the other side. Then I tried acute and chronic inflammation and calcium deposition on the tissues involved. Again, no change. So, then I tried the scar frequencies. Again, no change. So finally I tried my AIEAC treatment. First with a ½ inch needle. But I had a tough time keeping the needle in. So I did it with a electrode instead. The first time I did it for 15 minutes at 15Hz. That seemed to help a little. Then I tried it again for 25 minutes. And that did it. The structured water mostly broke down into bulk water and leaked out of the wound. And the lump shrank proportionately. So, a firm lump can be due to an excessive buildup of structured water. It also proved two things I already knew would be true. And one thing I suspected was true. First, that you can use an electrode instead of a needle to do AIEAC. That is useful in cases of lateral epicondylitis for treating the inflamed tendon which is usually inflamed in 2 or 3 places. Now you can just use an electrode to cover the inflamed points. Just run it for 30 minutes or so.
Second, was the realization that removing electrons will break down structured water. That was obvious to me. And I was proved right. Now I have a condition that uses it. And it works! So, my engineering background pays dividends again! The last thing is something that is true in many areas, balance in everything. Here I am thinking of balance of charge. Here my thinking is that both regeneration and inflammation both are associated with negative charge. My thinking is that regeneration is associated with less negative charge than inflammation. And apparently proper function of structured water also depends on the amount of charge. So, proper balance of charge must also be paid attention to. Too few electrons leads to degeneration and desiccation of tissues. Since electrons are needed to make bonds, they are needed in regeneration. But too many electrons leads to inflammation and accumulation of water (both structured and unstructured).
As far as my stitches go, it seems that the stitches themselves may have played a role. Are they made of a hydrophilic substance? That I don’t know until I talk to the surgeon again. And he may not even know(He didn’t). That may play a role in the long period of inflammation most patients experience so I have been told. Another clue is it happened where the muscle was stitched back together. Muscle relaxation is also involved with the formation of structured water. My guess is that whatever the material the stitch is made of is what sets it off.